









"An encounter with S. H. Lim (Vivat Pitayaviriyakul) and his fashion and glamour photography is akin to a trip in a Time Machine. Back to the glory days and uncomplicated appeal of Thai cinema and beauty contests post-1957. His photographic prints have become the memory of that age, appearing as magazine covers, calendars and movie posters; all of them vivacious, beautiful, elegant, cool and dynamically sexy: Thailand’s first Miss Universe, Apasara Hongsakul, stepping out of an aeroplane fresh from her triumph in Miami, an angelic visitation to earthlings; Priya Rungruang, eternal sex siren, in a ‘two-piece’; Apuntree Prayuthsenee, Miss Thailand 1967, in Thai traditional dress. Or bikini-clad free-spirited star Orasa Israngkura na Ayathaya, exuberantly leaping in the air over coconut fronds. These are iconic images, but their photographer remains unknown to most of us.
S. H. Lim, a Thai photographer of Chinese blood, was born in 1930. A self-taught lensman, he took pictures for many well-known Thai publications such as Sakul Thai, Bangkok Weekly, Ploenjit, Or Sor Tor and Seansuk, from 1962 until his retirement after 1987. In 1963 he was awarded the silver and bronze medals by the New York Kodak Expo Photography Contest.
Kathmandu Photo Gallery is proud to present the work of S. H. Lim (Vivat Pityaviriyakul), as the first of our ‘Seeking Forgotten Thai Photographers’ project to highlight master photographers hitherto neglected by official Thai photographic history."
(copied from http://www.kathmandu-bkk.com/exhibition_present01.html )
One of the most interesting photos in this exhibition was of a girl sitting on a beach with her back to the camera. In the foreground is a stick in the sand with the model's bra draped over the stick. This is quite an old photo and for such a conservative country this would have been a very daring photo to make and display in public. It still looks very enticing even today.

Below is a palladium print made from large format film created by Tillman Crane. It was taken at St Columba’s Chapel, Isle of Iona. In the foreground of the frame is an old window ledge with several small stones of different sizes and shapes. In the center background there is the lower part of a window, and old white washed walls on either side.
Crane has captured the mystery of the scene in a simple style. He has made sure the main subjects are correctly exposed and left the window highlighted. There is no need to see what is outside as the story is about the stones and why they are placed on the window sill.
Before reading about the location of the scene, I felt that it was indeed somewhere old and used from the rough stone work and small window frame. The image fills me with sadness for some unknown reason; perhaps because of the feeling of remoteness that I get from the image and the unknown story behind each stone. Were they all placed there by one person or several different people? What were they thinking, feeling when they placed the stones?
I feel drawn to this place to witness this simple but mysterious scene and of course to photograph it in such a way as to capture the same feeling as I get when viewing Crane’s photograph.






Looking at Photographs by John Szarkowski
This book contains 100 pictures from the Museum of Modern Art, New York that have been chosen and written about by John Szarkowski.
The majority of the photographs are by famous photographers and Szarkowski provides an interesting essay in the form of historical notes about when and where the photograph was taken, some history about the photographer and for some of the photographs he explains why the aesthetics of the photograph work.
As John Szarkowski was one of the most important advocators for promoting photographs as pieces of art and promoting certain photographers to be entered into the cannons of Master Photographers, I was slightly disappointed that he has not provided more of his knowledge about the aesthetics of these photographs; in other words, why he considered a particular photograph to be so successful.
I don’t believe that Szarkowski chose all of the photographs because he thought they were aesthetically successful, but more of a mixture of aesthetics and some simply because they had an interesting history either in the form of when and where or who had taken them.
I do wish one of the few famous photo critics or someone as respected as John Szarkowski would write a book titled “This Photo is Successful Because”.
Sometimes wishes are granted; two months after reading the above book I sent away for Why Photographs Work by George Barr - 52 Great Images: Who Made Them, What Makes Them Special and Why.
This is the book I have wished for so many times. It contains a wide variety of images from famous to not so famous photographers. George Barr provides his thoughts on why each image is special then the photographer who took the image explains what their thoughts were in making the image. A short biography of each photographer is included and some technical information.
I believe this book will soon be added to the usual list of photography course work recommended books. There is nothing else out there that I have seen that will teach one so much, so quickly, so precisely and so interestingly.
Two thumbs up from this photographer!






On Photography by Susan Sontag
Susan Sontag provides several separate essays in her book. Some of the topics discussed overlap and others are quite original in each of the individual essays. The book is easy to read, but does not always flow so smoothly from one topic to the other. It’s the kind of book that can be read several times over and new ideas will pop out from the pages.
I’ve made a few notes from each of the essays of the points that meant the most to me. Mostly I agree with her ideas, but a few I don’t think many active photographers would agree with. Looking through Amazon reviews for this book, one can see there is a division between the readers who generally agree with most of what Sontag presents, and the readers who believe she is being too negative towards photography.
I tend to agree with most of what she presents, and some of it is negative criticism simply because photography can be seen as being a negative activity in some of it’s aspects.
The book first appeared in 1977 and despite the progress in the development of photography nearly all of Sontag’s thoughts are still valid in today’s photography environment.
In Plato’s Cave
Sontag gives an interesting and original view on how photographs have extended into our lives and changed the way we think about news, places, history etc. Sontag believes that photography has become one of the main ways of experiencing things.
America Seen Through Photographs, Darkly
Early photographs were made to be “idealized images”, and even today amateurs strive to photograph something beautiful.
She goes on to say “all photographs accord value to their subjects, but the meaning of value can be changed. This can be demonstrated by taking the value of a photograph by a famous photographer.” This statement is in line with some of the John Berger’s thoughts in his book ‘Ways of Seeing’, and I relate it with some of the information I have been reading about Eugene Atget, where his photographs held little value until the Museum of Modern Art (MMA) and others made Atget famous after his death.
This essay then changes tact and Sontag makes a comparison between an exhibit in 1955 called “Family Man” organized by Edward Steichen. 503 photographs from 68 countries and 273 photographers trying to show all people are one humanity. Then in 1972 the MMA displayed 112 photographs by Diane Arbus that showed the complete opposite. Each one of Arbus’ photographs showed a freak in some sense of the word because they were so different.
Sontag mentions something interesting that Brassai had once said; that he denounced photographers who try to trap their subjects off-guard in the erroneous belief that something special will be revealed about them. Sontag does not agree with Brassai on this point and neither do I.
The essay makes its way back to the work of Diane Arbus and makes some very astute observations about Arbus. She states that Arbus clearly wanted her subjects to be fully aware of being photographed. Sontag explains a little about the psychological impact of photographing people’s faces at different angles. Sontag believes Arbus must have befriended most of her subjects to be allowed to photograph them from the front.
Sontag concludes this essay by saying that people in industrialized nations have become ‘image junkies’ needing reality and experience confirmed by photographs. “Ultimately, having an experience becomes identical with taking a photograph of it….” I don’t quite agree with this last statement, but can see that people attach great importance to recording their experience through photography for fear of losing something that no longer exists.
Melancholy Objects
Sontag looks at the class issue and how it relates to photography. She compares several famous photographers works and how they documented people differently. She discusses how in USA so many photographers have photographed the decay and soon to be last part of USA.
I’ve noticed that decay is still something that draws a lot of photographers focus. This maybe because photographing decay is easier than finding something beautiful in today’s hectic world. And even once something beautiful has been found, like a flower, it’s not so easy to make the photograph stand out as a work of beauty.
The Heroism of Vision
Sontag talks about photographing the world in this essay. She says photographs have beautified the world; “Photographers were supposed to do more than just see the world as it is, including its already acclaimed marvels; they were to create interest, by new visual decisions.” This is becoming truer by the day as almost everything has already been photographed. She says that what became beautiful was just what the eye can’t (or doesn’t) see. She’s talking about abstract impressionists work here.
Sontag talks about how the impressionists were influenced by photography. She says it is common place, but I doubt all painters will admit to such a thing. Interestingly, I read that Eugene Atget owned a shop in Paris called ‘Documents pour Artists’ – providing pictures for painters.
She says from 1840 onward that painters and photographers have influenced and pillaged each other.
Sontag discusses a observations about Atget. She says that Weston thought Atget as “not a fine technician”, however contemporary taste faults Weston for his devotion to perfect print. Imperfect technique has come to be appreciated precisely because it breaks the sedate equation of Nature and Beauty. I dare say John Szarkowski had something to do with the change in taste after promoting Atget’s work after his demise.
One last interesting quote from this essay; “Photographs can do distress. But the anesthetizing tendency of photography is such that the medium which conveys distress ends by neutralizing it.” Here Sontag is talking about how a photograph of something unpleasant can cause distress, but after it is viewed so many times, the next photograph of a similar situation is no longer as distressing.
Photographic Evangels
This essay deals with a reoccurring question from some of her previous essays; whether photography is an aggressive act. She states that few photographers has spoken openly about the exploitative aspects, but two who have are Avedon and Henri Cartier-Bresson. In a biography of Henri Cartier-Bresson by Pierre Assouline it is mentioned that Cartier-Bresson likened his photography to his days in Africa as a wildlife hunter.
From a different perspective Sontag says that Ansel Adams called the camera “instruments of love and revelation.”
For me, photography falls into both sides of the fence depending on the type of photography and even perhaps the photographer themselves. Still life photography can hardly be called aggressive, whereas some paparazzi would appear to be aggressive.
The essay discusses the common topic of whether photography is an art or not. She gives some interesting ideas. It’s the first time I have seen where someone compares commercial assignments or picture postcards with photography as an art. She states that museum exhibits become studies of the possibilities of photography. She, however does not try to determine at what point a photographers work becomes art.
Then, she goes on to discuss what makes a good photograph. “one criterion of evaluation which painting and photography do share is inovativeness; both painting and photographs are often valued because they impose new formal schemes or changes in the visual language. Another defining characteristic is quality of presence.” Quite different from value of a photograph, there is not enough written about what makes a good photograph in my opinion, and Sontag statement above is quite accurate and daring.
Sontag says its not altogether wrong to say there is no such thing as a bad photograph, only less interesting ones, less relevant or less mysterious.
At the end of this essay Sontag very clearly summarizes photography in terms of being an art; “Photography is not, to begin with, an art form at all. Like language it is a medium in which works of art (among other things) are made.” “Out of photography, one can make passport photos, weather, porno, wedding albums and Atget Paris.”
The Image World
A large part of this essay is about how photography differs in China from other places and Sontag suggests that photography will probably not be put to best use as a surveillance tool in China because of the strict formal way in which most photographs are taken. This was very good analysis from the 70s and it would appear that she was correct. I wonder if she saw how much the West was going to relay on photography as a surveillance tool.

Women by Annie Leibovitz and Susan Sontag
Although this book is about women it goes much further than this single subject for me. It shows how a collection of often dramatic photographs can be compiled into something quite profound and with greater meaning than any single photograph within the collection. Of course the quality of Annie Leibovitz’s portraits is among the best and this is the main reason for this book being so great. However, if the same quality can be applied to other subjects in a such a diverse and sometimes dramatic style, then they will also form something worth looking at and understanding.
Sontag, in her true fashion hits the mark in a most original way as a foreword essay. “Each of these pictures must stand on its own. But the ensemble say, so this is what women are now…”
This statement rang out to me and I wished that I had seen this book at the beginning of the course. Each picture must stand on its own and as the ensemble must show the greater meaning. This is what needs to be remembered when putting together a portfolio or even a small set of photographs. I’d say this even applies if the intention is only to show a set made up of completely different topics.






